“The Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC
is a European Union
Directive, which creates the right for EU workers to a minimum
number of holidays each year, paid breaks, and rest of at least 11 hours in any
24 hours; restricts excessive night work; and makes a default right to work no
more than 48 hours per week. It was issued as an update on earlier versions
from 22 June 2000 and 23 November 1993.[1] Excessive working time being cited
as a major cause of stress, depression and illness, the stated purpose of the
Directive is to protect people's health and safety.” Wikipedia
Isn’t that nice. The working Time Directive is
a piece of legislation which protects workers and the human rights of those
workers, to ensure they are protected in paid employment and neither exploited, nor neglected, nor disenfranchised.
So what about Carers? Today is Carers Rights Day, so it seems a good opportunity to measure the rights of paid and unpaid workers and see what we get.
As a sandwich carer my approximate saving to
society and the all singing all dancing all important tax payers, was
approximately £180,000 last year. That’s one year and it was worked out
calculating the hours I worked caring for my younger daughter only. It didn’t
factor in my Mum who had Alzheimer’s nor my older daughter who has Asperger’s
syndrome.
The Workers Time Directive of course only
covers those who are in paid employment so apparently, I don’t qualify. I do get
paid for the work I do, of course, the government are not "heartless", I received
the princely sum of £58 a week. Great, so of the £180,000 pounds I save the
treasury per year, they give me back £3,016. Well thats fair...
I chose to have these children and apparently a
mother, so therefore they are all my responsibility. Well yes except my mum was
actually the responsibility of the state and I thought having children was an
option, not restricted to parents who produce just the “right sort” of children .
So having established I do work, as I sort of
get paid, (a CEO negotiating his salary on those terms and conditions versus the
hours clocked would have the worst solicitor in the world to sign up) let's look
at the details.
According to the Workers Time Directive it creates the RIGHT for EU workers to a minimum number of holidays each year,
paid breaks, and rest of at least 11 hours in any 24 hours; restricts excessive
night work; and makes a default right to work no more than 48 hours per week.
I work in the EU, we have a holiday on average
once every 5 years due to financial costs and the inability for travel through
airports, or to places unknown to my younger daughter and our last one was cut
from 5 days to 3 due to the challenges faced by her disability.
Just before our holiday in 2007 my mum took a
very bad turn for the worst and so we thought we would have to cancel, as it
was she rallied and the cost of the calls everyday to ensure her progress was
massive.
It wasn’t relaxing and it wasn’t a break. It was
peppered with challenges and red tape and expensive letters to take medicines
and insurance for two children with disabilities is vast. Factor in Airports
who don’t understand hidden disability or a resistant girl who doesn't want to be "patted down" irrespective of whether she has triggered an alarm walking through a weird doorless doorway, and a child who would only take medicine
in yogurt, the yogurt she was used to, from England, and delays and constant pending epileptic seizures through stress of
a change in routine, and massive anxiety to my older daughter because of her Asperger's syndrome ....and you will understand why it takes us 5 years to recover
between holidays.
So Minimum number of holidays =Fail
Paid breaks? Hmm, well if
you are really really determined and really, really lucky, that there is still
any kind of provider still operating under the cuts and you qualify under the
very stringent eligibility criteria, you may get some respite.
Respite is crucial for everyone. Socially speaking when it comes to disabled children/elderly disabled relatives, they are not top of the list when it comes to visits from or to friends, parties dinners sleepovers trips out etc.
Respite is crucial for everyone. Socially speaking when it comes to disabled children/elderly disabled relatives, they are not top of the list when it comes to visits from or to friends, parties dinners sleepovers trips out etc.
Aside from the behaviours which people aren’t
keen on, aside for the toilet requirements which people are terrified of, apart from the inability to interpret non verbal clues or needs, or rising anxiety
levels, some people are really shallow and judgmental, I mean inexperienced. So it's not comfortable for them to be around disability. Respite on any level is crucial but expensive.
So Paid breaks (any breaks)=Fail
Rest of at least 11 hours in any 24 hours. Ha
ha ha ha ha….Oh sorry you’re serious. Well lets see when you have to ensure
medications are taken at least twice a day, if not 3 times for three people, who
also need to be fed 3 times a day and washed twice a day, when you have to ensure they have exercise and
are occupied and loved and talked to and that the washing is done and the
environment is clean and safe. The very high levels of anxiety means soothing
and calming is a constant. No awareness of danger and the tendancy of wandering
off and need to be found, of turning a home into a lock down unit and ensuring
risk is avoided, is key.When you are on the phone sorting school provision and
benefits and service providers and ensuring that you remember to eat and wash
and think and not have a nervous breakdown and keep a marriage going etc etc
etc having a rest for 11 hours….not so much.
So Rest for 11 hours in any 24 hours= Fail
Restricts excessive night work. Um ok, If you
know anything about Autism or Alzheimers you’ll understand that the notion of
day and night can at times be quite fluid. Sleeplessness with Autism is common, both settling and remaining asleep and even if you manage to grab two hours
together the worry is constant that the person you care for has woken up and is
in significant danger. Or they have woken up and put a Thomas the Tank engine
video on a 3am at top volume and you have to try and resolve that because your
husband has to get up at 6am and if he's late again he'll get the sack and your other child has to go to school where she is routinely bullied for being different. Then the
phone rings and it’s your mum with Alzheimer's, who doesn’t realise it’s 4am not
4pm again. She’s frightened and confused and you need to explain, while she can
still phone, while she can still remember you, you have to love her through
this.
Restricts excessive Night work=Fail
Makes a default right to work no more than 48
hours per week. Uh ..Huh. Read all the above again. =FAIL
Caring is so many things. It’s complex and it’s
diverse and it’s a massive challenge and it’s a huge joy.
It’s done because of and with love, but it’s
the most undervalued and disparaged role in society. The government rhetoric
which has for a few years now targeted disabled people as liars and scroungers
has also set it’s sights on carers.
How dare they do either.
Family carers need more rights, they need more
support they need more recognition and they need less judgmental attitudes and
sneering reductive ignorance, because if we all stopped tomorrow what would any of
you budget holding, pen pushers do then?
We would like rights appreciated and recognised, because we are more than an enabling provider of a loved one for a photo
opportunity in election season.
We are more than unpaid unappreciated drones,
we’re people of value who do what we do for a motivation many politicians would
know nothing about.
Loving someone else much more than ourselves.
If I seem angry in writing this I'm sorry. I'm sorry that you're not angry and I'm sorry that apologising is the default requirement for carers. I hope it discomforts those who are unaffected. I hope it makes people think. Stoic silence is convenient but it's no promoter of good mental health.
When it comes to carers the old adage is
flipped but no less true- with no rights comes much responsibility.







